SciTechBlog   « Back to Blog Main
May 29, 2008
Posted: 09:18 AM ET

As a meteorologist I’ve been fascinated by the French skydiver trying to jump from a balloon at 130,000 feet.  Flying thru the stratosphere at the speed of sound with nothing but a skimpy space suit is just crazy to me.  Michel Vournier dreams of breaking the freefall record were postponed again this week when his balloon flew off without him.  Regardless, the whole story got me wanting to jump.   So up I went with a plane full of other more experienced skydivers at Freefall Adventures in south Jersey.  Going “tandem” with a pro attached to me for safety, we jumped at 15,300 feet (solidly in the troposphere).  That’s about 600 mb of atmospheric pressure (surface is around 1000mb).  So the breathing isn’t easy and I got a little light headed and cold (temperature is less than 40 degrees at that height).  Doesn’t matter cause you’re not there for long, and once you jump the adrenaline erases any chill in the air.  A quick acceleration to a peak speed of 138 mph and you realize Newton was right about this whole gravity thing!  Wow what a ride!!!!  At that altitude the air is thin but oxygen isn’t required… no helmet or space suit either.  Tee shirt, jeans, and instructor Range Luda strapped to my back is all that was needed.  Freefalling for 70 seconds was incredible… spiritual in fact.  I’ve been on top of high mountains, but being that high with NOTHING beneath you is mind blowing.  The view, of course, is phenomenal.  All you hear and feel is the air rushing around you.  You want it to last forever but the ground approaches quickly.  At 5000 feet I pull the chute and Range guides us to a smooth landing.  It’s a rush to say the least.  Admittedly this was my second jump, but the butterflies were swirling just as much as during my first leap 6 years ago.  You say you like roller coasters, a nice view, and being buffeted by the wind?   Well jumping out of a perfectly good airplane may be just the thing for you… just don’t forget to pull the rip cord!!! 

Rob Marciano    CNN Meteorologist

 

Filed under: Uncategorized


Share this on:
JAy.   May 29th, 2008 2:48 pm ET

I haven’t ever jumped before, but you may be right about it being just the thing for people who want an incredible view. Using your numbers for my basis, you should have experienced 54 seconds of free fall. What a chance to see the world from a point of view that so few will actually see!

Then you still the the last 5000 feet of decent under parachute.

Totally amazing!

Scott   May 30th, 2008 10:16 am ET

I just jumped with the Golden Knights of the US Army Parachute team last week and it was totally amazing!!!! We jumped at 13,100 ft and had about 45-50 seconds of free fall. I have never experienced anything like it. Once the parachute opened up and we started to float in the air (or at least it seemed like it), you get to see the world like never before.

tim   May 30th, 2008 10:18 am ET

so you did a dive….big deal. what a baby!

KnuckleHead   May 30th, 2008 1:14 pm ET

I actually tried to bungee jump once. Couldn’t make myself do it. I had to take the walk of shame. After that experience, I can’t even imaging jumping out of an airplane. In my mind, I think about it in much the same way as body piercing; I generally try to aviod getting holes poked in my body about as much as I try to avoid falling from high places. Just ain’t me, I guess.

Lindsay   May 30th, 2008 4:35 pm ET

Hi Rob, I also jumped tandem at Freefall Adventures in southern New Jersey. But you jumped at 13,500 feet.

FAR Part 91.211 states that no person may operate a civil aircraft at altitudes above 15,000 feet unless each occupant is provided with supplemental oxygen.

The FAR regulations don’t make the experience any less amazing or life-changing, though.

Erica   May 30th, 2008 7:46 pm ET

Congratulations on your second skydive! Don’t wait so long to make your third. It seems like you loved it, so you should take the next step and learn to go with your own parachute. Taking more ownership of the experience makes it even more amazing.

In the wise words of Leonardo da Vinci,

For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you will long to return.

Mark Rejhon   May 30th, 2008 8:36 pm ET

I am a licensed skydiver (Actually, Canada’s first licensed deaf skydiver, listed on the deafskydivers.org website)

I think what he was given was data given by the instructor recorded by a freefall logging device such as a ProTrack, which is about the size of a Zippo lighter or wristwatch. From my knowledge, 70 seconds of freefall from 15,300 feet is normal, and 138 mph is a normal peak speed, though 120 mph is a normal average terminal velocity speed.

However, terminal velocity is not constant (as any of you watching Mythbuster’s skydiving episode all knows), based on how streamlined your body position is, you can speed up or slow down your fall. Tandems vary in fall speed, and it takes approximately 10-20 seconds to accelerate to peak freefall speed. So the first 1000 feet could take more than 10 seconds, while the next 1000 feet could take only 6 seconds, for example, because it took time to accelerate to near your terminal velocity.

Aussie Jane   June 1st, 2008 4:15 pm ET

Mark, you’re talking about B2E (belly to earth) right? That is true, I think the terminal speed is roughly 120-130 mph. What I wonder is, due to the density layering at various levels, would a terminal velocity be much higher at say 50,000 feet because the air is so sparse up there, and not as much wind drag? I would assume that terminal velocity is faster the higher up in the atmosphere you are falling, then would decrease as the air gets more dense.

Herb   June 3rd, 2008 12:03 pm ET

Aussie Jane, your comment shows you are thinking but…just like atmospheric density, gravitational forces also change as you get further from earth :)

INTER NET FREE PRESS   June 6th, 2008 10:57 pm ET

YOU SHOULD READ MY BOOK “BORNED OUT OF THE SUN” IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN SCIENCE. VISIT INTERNET FREE PRESS.

THE UNIFYING INFINITESIMAL PARTICLE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE ORGANIZATION AND BEHAVIOR OF ALL MATTER

george   June 9th, 2008 10:14 pm ET

I am not sure if this is the wright place but i just do not understand why there is not alot of talk about sugar as another fuel if brazil can be indepent of focil fuel why can we not start there just is not a enough talk about it either in news or the senate i no its not the total answere but it would certainly help.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

As we reach out to learn more about the universe, we're all coming to terms with our relationship to our home planet: Pollution, solutions, and challenges in the way we live - and what we may leave behind. New Gadgets, and new discoveries, from the lab to the edges of the Galaxy; and the crossroad where science, religion, money and politics collide.

Miles O'Brien and CNN's Sci-Tech team debrief, decode, and occasionally debunk the torrent of news about our earth, space, and cyberspace.

CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com