<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smell this book!   and other summer reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike jacob</title>
		<link>http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/#comment-27240</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnscitech.wordpress.com/?p=262#comment-27240</guid>
		<description>Rudi,
There are great difference between saying something, and it being true.  I must admit I like you spirit, but I hope that you will try to delve further into the reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudi,<br />
There are great difference between saying something, and it being true.  I must admit I like you spirit, but I hope that you will try to delve further into the reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi Merom</title>
		<link>http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/#comment-4725</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi Merom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnscitech.wordpress.com/?p=262#comment-4725</guid>
		<description>And brian we can not see more then 1 second distance that is  speed of light distance.....we never can see 2 seconds of distence....only when the first second is done we will see the 2nd as it become the first... if we could see farther we would see faster then the speed of light.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And brian we can not see more then 1 second distance that is  speed of light distance.....we never can see 2 seconds of distence....only when the first second is done we will see the 2nd as it become the first... if we could see farther we would see faster then the speed of light.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi Merom</title>
		<link>http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/#comment-4720</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi Merom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnscitech.wordpress.com/?p=262#comment-4720</guid>
		<description>To:Larian LeQuella

It is sad to see that a human is down grading another one because of lake of knowladge or arogance......what i said is 100% true and if you wish for me to explain it to you you can email me and i am sure that you mind will open in a place that you never saw before.....downing any person adult kid of any age shows lake of self confidence.....my view can not be disputed because it is true not because i am smart....it was true before me and will be after me. 

As for Brian the explanation is: we can not see faster then the speed of light as nothing that we know yet...can move faster then the speed of light...we never can see faster then the speed of light.....so you can make the math as how far can we see in 1 Second (or less).....if you need a more detailed explanation please email me.
Thanks
Rudi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To:Larian LeQuella</p>
<p>It is sad to see that a human is down grading another one because of lake of knowladge or arogance......what i said is 100% true and if you wish for me to explain it to you you can email me and i am sure that you mind will open in a place that you never saw before.....downing any person adult kid of any age shows lake of self confidence.....my view can not be disputed because it is true not because i am smart....it was true before me and will be after me. </p>
<p>As for Brian the explanation is: we can not see faster then the speed of light as nothing that we know yet...can move faster then the speed of light...we never can see faster then the speed of light.....so you can make the math as how far can we see in 1 Second (or less).....if you need a more detailed explanation please email me.<br />
Thanks<br />
Rudi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franko</title>
		<link>http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/#comment-4063</link>
		<dc:creator>Franko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnscitech.wordpress.com/?p=262#comment-4063</guid>
		<description>The Cavemen were graphic illustrators; Passing on their knowledge of hunting skills, and Sexual Taste, Educating future generations. Our mental modeling skills developed from Biblical writings, to the Industrial Revolution, then, someone commented &quot;Media is the Message&quot;. 

&quot;It’s another medium of peer pressure&quot; ?
Let&#039;s make a deal, you got something I want. I got what you want
Pulling on the rope is more effective, than pushing.
The extreme delight, ecstasy, from a 10 year old, 
when I hooked up a webcam to the computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cavemen were graphic illustrators; Passing on their knowledge of hunting skills, and Sexual Taste, Educating future generations. Our mental modeling skills developed from Biblical writings, to the Industrial Revolution, then, someone commented &#034;Media is the Message&#034;. </p>
<p>&#034;It’s another medium of peer pressure&#034; ?<br />
Let&#039;s make a deal, you got something I want. I got what you want<br />
Pulling on the rope is more effective, than pushing.<br />
The extreme delight, ecstasy, from a 10 year old,<br />
when I hooked up a webcam to the computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Callahan</title>
		<link>http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator>S Callahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnscitech.wordpress.com/?p=262#comment-4057</guid>
		<description>Larian is correct on that...I think the  focus should be on &#039;training&#039; the parents in internet use... enabling them to be a leader for their children. No doubt it&#039;s a tool for learning..but like a new book children have to be introduced to the areas where the can explored topics both familiar and unfamiliar.  
The facts show that social networking sites are the hottest spot for teens. I noticed that some of the guys and gals at Phoneix have recently started posting learning vd&#039;s with current music that seems to pull people in...maybe that&#039;s the way...reach them where they are through innovative ideas of presentation....it&#039;s not that the young don&#039;t want to learn ..it&#039;s that the avenue to learning that has changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larian is correct on that...I think the  focus should be on &#039;training&#039; the parents in internet use... enabling them to be a leader for their children. No doubt it&#039;s a tool for learning..but like a new book children have to be introduced to the areas where the can explored topics both familiar and unfamiliar.<br />
The facts show that social networking sites are the hottest spot for teens. I noticed that some of the guys and gals at Phoneix have recently started posting learning vd&#039;s with current music that seems to pull people in...maybe that&#039;s the way...reach them where they are through innovative ideas of presentation....it&#039;s not that the young don&#039;t want to learn ..it&#039;s that the avenue to learning that has changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larian LeQuella</title>
		<link>http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/#comment-4055</link>
		<dc:creator>Larian LeQuella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnscitech.wordpress.com/?p=262#comment-4055</guid>
		<description>My first comment admonishing Rudi for his poor science was deleted (I MAY have been a bit harsh in my wording).  Suffice it to say that his assertions have the same merit as proclaiming the earth to be flat.  I can only imagine what Mr. Bauerlein would have to say if he chose Rudi as a subject of study.

Very cool to see one of the authors in this blog though!  In answer to your question, I would say that one of the largest failings is on the part of the parents who don&#039;t get involved in their children&#039;s internet activities.  I steer my daughter towards places that are discussing new discoveries in science.  It&#039;s a start at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first comment admonishing Rudi for his poor science was deleted (I MAY have been a bit harsh in my wording).  Suffice it to say that his assertions have the same merit as proclaiming the earth to be flat.  I can only imagine what Mr. Bauerlein would have to say if he chose Rudi as a subject of study.</p>
<p>Very cool to see one of the authors in this blog though!  In answer to your question, I would say that one of the largest failings is on the part of the parents who don&#039;t get involved in their children&#039;s internet activities.  I steer my daughter towards places that are discussing new discoveries in science.  It&#039;s a start at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/#comment-4054</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnscitech.wordpress.com/?p=262#comment-4054</guid>
		<description>Rudi, what do you mean by &quot;we are not able to see faster then the speed of light&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudi, what do you mean by &#034;we are not able to see faster then the speed of light&#034;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bauerlein</title>
		<link>http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/#comment-4052</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bauerlein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnscitech.wordpress.com/?p=262#comment-4052</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Peter, the benefits of the Internet are extraordinary. It&#039;s a miraculous advent. But the most beneficial uses aren&#039;t the ones that appeal most to the kids. WHen Nielsen ranked most popular sites for teens, nine out of the top ten were for social networking. That&#039;s what the Web means to them: nonstop contact with one another. It&#039;s not a window into history, art, civics, literature, foreign affairs. It&#039;s another medium of peer pressure, this one running 24/7. 

The big question for educators is: How do we transfer all that generational interactivity toward knowledge- and taste-inducing exercises?

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;re right, Peter, the benefits of the Internet are extraordinary. It&#039;s a miraculous advent. But the most beneficial uses aren&#039;t the ones that appeal most to the kids. WHen Nielsen ranked most popular sites for teens, nine out of the top ten were for social networking. That&#039;s what the Web means to them: nonstop contact with one another. It&#039;s not a window into history, art, civics, literature, foreign affairs. It&#039;s another medium of peer pressure, this one running 24/7. </p>
<p>The big question for educators is: How do we transfer all that generational interactivity toward knowledge- and taste-inducing exercises?</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi Merom</title>
		<link>http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/02/smell-this-book-and-other-summer-reading/#comment-4048</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi Merom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnscitech.wordpress.com/?p=262#comment-4048</guid>
		<description>How Far can we see in Space ?

The assumption of most of the population is that you can see far in space….maybe billions of light years, the reality is that the maximum distance that we can see in space is only 186,000 miles and never more…whooo yes 186,000 miles this is the distance that the light travels in a second and we are not able to see faster then the speed of light, not with the naked eye and not with a telescope.
Think that our planet is surrounded with a shell of glass within a distance of 186,000 and anything that we see beyond this distance is a reflection on the glass.
Any one that claims that we can see farther then this distance derail you from the true, it is like looking with a microscope on a cell that is 10 inch away from you eye…you never look beyond this distance you only make what you see larger…..the same in space…. you only can see 186,000 mile distance and the telescope is only making this distance larger…..

If you want more details please email me to : rmerom@aol.com

Thanks
Rudi merom 
Also see:  www.evolutionthetruth.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How Far can we see in Space ?</p>
<p>The assumption of most of the population is that you can see far in space….maybe billions of light years, the reality is that the maximum distance that we can see in space is only 186,000 miles and never more…whooo yes 186,000 miles this is the distance that the light travels in a second and we are not able to see faster then the speed of light, not with the naked eye and not with a telescope.<br />
Think that our planet is surrounded with a shell of glass within a distance of 186,000 and anything that we see beyond this distance is a reflection on the glass.<br />
Any one that claims that we can see farther then this distance derail you from the true, it is like looking with a microscope on a cell that is 10 inch away from you eye…you never look beyond this distance you only make what you see larger…..the same in space…. you only can see 186,000 mile distance and the telescope is only making this distance larger…..</p>
<p>If you want more details please email me to : <a href="mailto:rmerom@aol.com">rmerom@aol.com</a></p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Rudi merom<br />
Also see:  <a href="http://www.evolutionthetruth.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.evolutionthetruth.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
