SciTechBlog   « Back to Blog Main
April 27, 2009

The strange concept of white holes

Posted: 07:50 AM ET

In researching a story about what it might look like if you were to fall into a black hole, I came across the concept of white holes.

This is not a new idea, but it’s fascinating, so for those of you who have never heard about it, here’s a primer.

Think of a white hole as an “anti-black hole,” according to Cornell University’s Curious About Astronomy Web site. So if black holes are places where matter is sucked in, white holes could be where it spews out, like water through a fire hose.

“Some people say maybe all that material that’s collapsing into this black hole… goes through a worm hole or some theoretical idea and blasts out in some other place in the universe,” said Jeff McClintock, senior astrophysicist, at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Another way to look at it is through the waterfall analogy. If you think of a black hole as space falling down one side of a ravine, imagine it bouncing off the bottom and climbing back up the other side, said Andrew Hamilton, a professor of astrophysics at the University of Colorado, Boulder.

“But you never see that thing in nature and it doesn’t happen in real black holes,” Hamilton said.

The concept of white holes is totally theoretical and most people don’t give it much credence, McClintock added.

“Thousands of astronomers are just grinding their brains away on black holes,” he said. “You compare that to a white hole, I don’t think you’ll find one astronomer grinding his brain away.”

Posted by: ,
Filed under: Astronomy • Space


Share this on:
Nithryok   April 28th, 2009 11:44 am ET

Now after reading all of that..

What if we are in fact inside a blackhole? What if space its self is in fact a blackhole?

As for the universe expanding yes its possable, but what happens when it stops, or what causes it to stop? If its loss of energy then what is the force that is causing it to collapse.

As for whiteholes.. maybe blackholes are whiteholes when blackholes reach max compaticty. But on the other hand if blackholes just consume time/space/matter ect and constantly compress all of it into some type of super condensed matter what is its breaking point?
Or maybe inside a blackhole a universe is created, thus leading to my theory that we are living inside of a blackhole right now. Which could go further to explane UFO's. Some distant travelers from a different blackhole that found a way to travel threw them.

What do you think about that?


Ulf W   April 28th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

Once upon a time, matter was compressed (divided) into a black hole singularity such that all its constituent particles left the "particle" state and all we could see as a manifestation of the singularity mass was its gravity force. Now, what if you could divide the gravity force into further constituents? Anyone?

And what if we are sorely limited by our capabilites to only observe 3-d space falling through time? Maybe we need multi-dimensional observation skills?

Anyone for tennis?


Lisa   April 28th, 2009 12:48 pm ET

What goes in must come out, right?😛


Ryan in VA   April 28th, 2009 12:52 pm ET

The point is not if this whole thing can be proven or not. The point is coming up with new ideas that could possibly be plausible. Sooner or later someone will get it right. BUT, if you don't "waste your time" postulating, you'll never come up with that idea, thus you'll never understand. The quest for knowledge is its own reward, so just bask in that and don't worry about why you're thinking. Newton, Einstein, Hawking... they were/are thinkers. If one stops thinking, one stops learning. If one stops learning, one stops living.


Jason   April 28th, 2009 1:00 pm ET

White holes don't exist. Black holes are massive enough that light can't escape its gravity. The mass stays there until the black hole becomes unstable. That's it. No white holes, no rip in the time space continuum, no going 88 mph in a delornean and going back in time, nothing.

Of course, gravity itself can escape or it couldn't be measured.


jdinwva   April 28th, 2009 1:05 pm ET

and for many many years these same scientists thought black holes were the stuff of fantasy...


Mike in NJ   April 28th, 2009 1:30 pm ET

And to all you guys that say, "better things to do here on Earth," this "basic, irrelevant Science" you all refer to is the source of many of the most useful and important discoveries ever. Computers, Nuclear Power, DNA sequencing, and truckloads of other technologies and discoveries were and are being made by scientists doing the dirtiest gruntwork of science, called "Basic Research".

It involves making hypotheses, doing experiments Over and Over and Over to get repeatable results and verify them, and writing about these experiments in what most people would consider the most boring journals EVER. And out of that incredibly hard work comes Technology to make our lives easier.

So remember that when someone asks you whether you think we should go to Mars. The discoveries we make along the way may very well be the thing that saves Humankind from its own folly.


Devin   April 28th, 2009 1:31 pm ET

how about this idea god made the universe and every planet, black hole, sun, and all that space is his canvas to do what he pleases and our little primate brains will never understand all that universe because we are not the smartest there is some one always smarter we jus havent found them yet but anyway feel free to make me feel stupid for what i belive but ya never kno i could be rite


s. carney   April 28th, 2009 1:36 pm ET

Imagine a whirlpool down a drain. A 'white hole' is where the water would go if that whirlpool were 4 dimensional and infinitely deep. The infinity, in 4D, is possible because the vortex continues spiraling back outward on the opposite side of its center of gravity (not event horizon).

The shape of the universe is a 4 dimensional sphere. What we observe, however, is only a three dimensional shadow inside of the whole, which is a torus (infinitely small, but not zero, at the center, and expanding in the direction of infinity in volume). Every gravity well exhibits this asymetry, (which is really symetry in 4D), but black holes are observably pronounced.

The 3D shadow of a 4D universe appears to us as only one side of any gravity well, or 'drain'. We can't see the opposite side of this spiral because of the event horizon.


Cliff Elfstrom   April 28th, 2009 7:23 pm ET

Time doesn't occur without change. As long as there is change, there is time. As we accelerate, even in free fall, time will run slower. Our attractive and repulsive forces will be weaker because they are spread out over time compared to our less accelerated neighbors. If we accept the fact that matter never exceeds the speed of light, we will better understand our universe. Much of what we learned from studying the theories of black holes can be applied to "dark holes" which cannot nor ever will form an "event horizon". Anything "below the event horizon" does not nor ever will exist". So much of what we theorized will happen before we reach the speed of light but we will be reduced to plasma quickly compared to the universe and to our own consciousness.


rob   April 28th, 2009 9:38 pm ET

Sure, coming up with ideas, theories and "educated guesses", like i said before, is great and very interesting, but the reason for my last post was that some people seemed to be making fun of other peoples ideas, while acting as if their own idea is proven fact, which of course... it isn't.

So yes, make theories and come up with explanations, but don't pretend that it's all 100% proven fact and that anyone who thinks differently is stupid and wrong.


Chris   April 29th, 2009 1:31 am ET

Ok, to the people who don't understand what the terms "theory" and "law" mean in a scientific context:

"Scientific laws are similar to scientific theories in that they are principles that can be used to predict the behavior of the natural world. Both scientific laws and scientific theories are typically well-supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. Usually scientific laws refer to rules for how nature will behave under certain conditions. Scientific theories are more overarching explanations of how nature works and why it exhibits certain characteristics."

Black holes are stellar objects whose mass has collapsed to a singularity. The event horizon is the region of spacetime where light cannot escape. If the sun in our solar system were to suddenly become a black hole, ignoring electron degeneracy pressure or the Pauli exclusion principle, we would NOT go spiraling in. The mass of the sun is unchanged; you have to approach the black hole very closely before you notice the special effects.

Those who deride the ideas of quantum mechanics and general relativity as just "theories" need to stop using the computers that rely on these faulty "theories". Or stop using medicine or eating food from the grocery store if you think evolution is just a "theory".


Chris   April 29th, 2009 1:45 am ET

Oh, and to the folks who have brought up Hawking radiation:

T = (hc^3)/(8πGMkb)

T = The temperature of the black hole
h = Planck's constant (usually h-bar, but I'm typing on a computer)
c = the speed of light
G = Newton's gravitational constant
M = the mass of the black hole
kb = Boltzmann's constant (usually k with b in subscript)


nina   April 30th, 2009 1:02 pm ET

I am pretty sure white holes were already explained on Red Dwarf


John   April 30th, 2009 2:58 pm ET

The connecting notions of black/white holes assumes the premise that matter, which is sucked into a black hole, goes somewhere else. There is no evidence or theory to suppose that it does.
Neither is there any evidence for an area of stellar vomitous.

A black hole is pretty much like the Hotel California or your credit card. Once you're sucked in, that's it.


nate   April 30th, 2009 10:09 pm ET

Seems like a lot of people ignored the last three sentences of this little blurb.

"The concept of white holes is totally theoretical and most people don’t give it much credence, McClintock added.

“Thousands of astronomers are just grinding their brains away on black holes,” he said. “You compare that to a white hole, I don’t think you’ll find one astronomer grinding his brain away.”

There we are.


Chris Torvik   May 2nd, 2009 8:26 pm ET

"We already know things that do this, they’re called quasars and they make mass ejections of matter into the universe."

ERIC IS RIGHT.


Bill   May 2nd, 2009 8:32 pm ET

White holes can't exist because the mass that falls into a black hole doesn't go anywhere else to be "spewed forth", it just stays there, in the black hole, adding to the mass of the black hole, that's why they're so super-massive that they bend space time and light.

Quasars are not "white holes". They are not spewing forth more matter than they have. As far as I know, the current theory is they're just super-massive early universe stars / proto-galaxies. I'd have to go read up on it, but calling them "white holes" just doesn't make sense.


xavier   May 2nd, 2009 8:45 pm ET

im pnly nine but i love space and stuff like that so i found this article to be quet interesting.


Jason   May 2nd, 2009 9:28 pm ET

To all of the posters on here that have said the word 'theory,' well, 'theory' is how we made it to the moon; theory is how we made it to space at all. 'Theory' is why we have cell phones and their technology; 'theory' is why television works; 'theory' is the entire reason why MRI machines work; 'theory' is why satellites are so accurate and how we can always know their exact position in space at any given time; 'theory is why GPS works and is the most accurate time keepers known to man; and 'theory' is why the space shuttle works at all, clunky looking as it is. Theory is how we know to invest our money and time into a project, because if somebody has already theorized it, and that somebody has been peer-reviewed and respected, then you can bet their 'theory' will work. So as far as the Hawkin Radiation, you can bet that it is so–or at least as close to the truth as possible. Our entire technological age is based entirely on 'theory.'


Ralph   May 2nd, 2009 10:05 pm ET

Fascinating, and informative (though not always in a positive fashion). I had always thought that a white hole is the area inside the black hole (not the singularity, but the area around it from which light can't escape) that contains the light and other materials that have not collected to the singularity. They can't escape, but they haven't been crushed yet. Most people seem to think of objects directly approaching a singularity/black hole, but they would generally approach at some angle, and then either be drawn into an ever-smaller orbit, or skipped out into space like a flat rock on water (in this instance, Opie = God).
For those who say we should solve our Earth problems before we worry about space–nowhere is it written that our solutions will be found here and not in space; in fact, nowhere is it written that our problems have solutions.
Meanwhile, it is fun to boggle one's own mind.


SuperflySki   May 3rd, 2009 12:28 am ET

I enjoy the thought that if you actually fell in a black hole, you wouldn't feel yourself being ripped apart before singularity. As you're being spaghettified (hmm, a reference to the Flying Spaghetti Monster?), the pressure on your body is so intense, that it causes you to go unconsious. So at least pain isn't a major factor in the ways of a black hole....Unless of course, you're not the only thing falling in there. If there're stars and other such things, well...You'd burn up before you even got close in the buildup to fall in.

We've seen the buildup around black holes and the big evidence is the fact that we're here right now. What's holding the galaxy together in a gravitational strong hold? What else lets off GRBs (gamma ray bursts)? As Jason said, theories are anwsers to questions backed by concrete scientific data and hyposthesises, while also supported by scientific laws (Paraphrased quote by Mr. Carpenter, biology/genetics teacher).

But about white holes, we have no evidence of them existing; no streams of broken and deformed or even pure energy being spewed out into our universe which is definately speeding up in expansion so to finally make the universe cold and deprived of most anything (at least interesting). Black holes even let off energy, leaking before being depleted if they're not 'fed'. If black holes interact with each other, they just get bigger (they're not going to suddenly turn white and spit all their mass back out. That just doesn't make sense). So if white holes exist, then they don't exist here. They'd be in a parallel universe if that even existed, where their physics and scientific laws would be opposite to ours, or at least significantly different.

But I suppose it's still fun to think about.


SuperflySki   May 3rd, 2009 12:36 am ET

Oh, and Ralph; I love your philosophy on space and our problems.

Another thing (and this bothered me for a while before I found out) black holes aren't actually 2-D holes! They're spheres of black so it doesn't matter what angle you come in at because you're going to end up in the center in the end. But you're right; you wouldn't just go straight in there, you'd swirl about the singularity before becoming part of the black hole's mass or as you said, being thrown back out (but you have to be special to have this happen; such as a binary star system).


Faithful Atheist   May 3rd, 2009 1:47 am ET

Devin: "feel free to make me feel stupid for what i belive but ya never kno i could be rite" – why is it that the faithful lemmings always spell so poorly? Most bloggers, myself included, make the occasional spelling mistake, but what this band of missionaries is spewing all over this blog is a bit unusual.

I believe the faith movement is much more about ego than intelligence, or lack of the same. What I learned in college is that I don't have a great scientific brain at all, as anything beyond the most basic concepts in analytical chemistry and physics were beyond my own ability to comprehend, or required too much time for me to learn – in this respect I may be poorer in that regard than a few of the missionaries who harrass discussion groups such as this one. The difference is that I paid attention to the simplest concept of all, which is called the scientific method – and that precludes absolutely all discussion of any irrational preconceptions, specifically "miracles". You don't need to understand every analytical process which a "scientist" follows in order to know whether he sticks to that basic, underlying formula or not, and I respect those who do. Scientists are the natural nemesis of religious leaders, who fight them by stoking the egos of all the followers who they may win over. They heap praise on them, telling them they are wiser than the scientists – for persisting in the faith which they sell (it certainly does continue to make an easy, comfortable living for themselves). Science and religious faith are the two ultimate, terminally competitive, and therefore completely incompatible products of the human mind – the important differences are that one is based on fact, observation, and continuous hard work, while the other owes it's existence and psychological power to old lies, emotional manipulation, and rhetorical slight of hand.


Faithful Atheist   May 3rd, 2009 2:05 am ET

Forgot to mention that when the religious leaders fail to turn their prospects against science, they add their own twisted version of it to their teachings, with the Scientific Method completely tossed out.


Lars   May 3rd, 2009 4:55 am ET

What's the point of posting this? Pure fiction. "Some people say" as an argument has no place on a scientific blog. Some people say werewolves stalk the night during a full moon, too.

Worthless spam.


rofflecoper   May 3rd, 2009 7:54 am ET

Meh, it's all theoretical with no definitive truth. Speculation at best, however I think Red Dwarf does it best. Cheers


rofflecoper   May 3rd, 2009 7:58 am ET

To Jason above who thinks theory is definitive, I assure you there has probably been thousands of times more theories proven wrong then right.

If at first you dont' succeed try and try again? So you just throw theories out until one proves right and that is simply all our techonology is, theories proven right that are built upon three times as many theories proven wrong.


William Grove   June 9th, 2009 10:41 pm ET

Einstein stated that for every action there is an opposite and equal reaction. There fore it would stand to reason that white holes or some component like that would have to be present to balance everything. Possible transport passages!


Matt Parks   June 11th, 2009 11:22 am ET

Not really related to the black hole theory. However people have stated that the universe is expanding at an ever increasing rate.

It has also been proven that the faster you move the slower time moves.

So, if this universe expansion theory is correct, isn't it safe to say that since the earth is moving through space at a much faster rate than it was 1000 years ago, that time today is moving much more slowly than it was 1000 years ago?

If this is not the case, that would mean that time on earth follows a different set of rules than time in space.

However if it is the case...
Do you think it is possible to measure this change of speed over time, and what implications could this have for the universe? Since the speed of light is a constant, and we're traveling through space at an ever increasing rate, will we eventually reach the speed of light and have time stop? And if that happens will be become immune to aging, and be able to go on with our lives? Or would life on earth just freeze?

Well, how about if the universe didn't end due to being sucked into a black hole or heat death, what about time ceasing to exist because everything is moving at the speed of light? Could that cause an end to the universe as we know it?


geekStinger   June 11th, 2009 10:59 pm ET

I saw a white hole the other day. It was spewing matter into the universe. A moon popped out and made friends with a guy that used to work at Microsoft. "Whats up with Vista" the moon asked the man. "Dude, I have no idea" the Microsoft guy replied. I saw a white hole the other day.


Derik   June 15th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

The matter sucked in by Black Holes does not "go away," it makes the Black Hole grow, to 'weigh more.'

The White Hole concept is an artifact that predates our properly understanding this. "If the matter goes in, it has to come out somewhere, right?" No, because it doesn't 'go' anywhere.


Kristina   June 16th, 2009 12:11 am ET

This is a response to "Jesus was an astronaut to:"
No one can prove that God is real. No one can prove that Jesus was the son of God. No one can prove that Adam and Eve even existed. No one can prove that my name is Kristina and that this book in front of me is really a book. Everything we consider common knowledge is just what we have come to know everything as, as a child...an infant. This book could have easily been called spoon. The color blue could really be green. Nothing can actually be PROVEN. Nothing is really a FACT. Everything that we come to "know," or rather assume, is based on what we have made of it.


einstien   June 16th, 2009 5:50 am ET

white hole is the next earth


Jason D   June 16th, 2009 8:25 am ET

I'm sorry, but after reading the previous article about "what happens inside a black hole", I can't take Anthony Hamilton seriously. I was wary at the Michael Jackson analogy, but they lost any credibility at "Spaghettification".


Doug   June 20th, 2009 11:39 pm ET

My theory is that all matter entering all black holes occupy the same space. Over billions and billions of years, when too much matter has accumulated to remain stable... BANG... new Universe.


M.W.   June 22nd, 2009 7:47 pm ET

@Kristina....dont forget that you can't even prove jesus was a real person


Haljordan   July 7th, 2009 7:10 pm ET

I like this blog, but it waivers a bit.😉
I just started reading because of black/white holes & worm holes. Ever siphen gas out of a car gastank with a rubber hose and watch it keep flowing by itself? Black holes work the same way.
Einstein said for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

I slam my fist against a wall for example. It doesn't go thru, but every movement, vibration, tremble and distruption of light can be added up equally to the force of the original slam of fist against the wall.

Why not Black holes? It doesn't make a whole lot of sense that every molecule would be destroyed into the tiniest particle of matter. Instead, why not one big "push" to another equal force, aka blackhole. Enter, then exit. aka wormhole. Like a magnet, they attract.

But what about not even light escaping a black hole? Irrelivant. The force that pulled something in is obviously the same force that pushes out, both of them being the same gravity that cannot escape light.

But what if that item hits something like a star or planet in the way? Won't happen. In Centrifugal force, an object that rotates around another object expands from it as the speed increases around it. On a large scale (such as our solar system) we do not recognize it (Although the planets are slowing down which explained some bigger push in the past that is no longer there).

Hold a rock on a peice of string. Swing it around. You get the picture.

Anyways, our atoms have electrons spinning around a nucleus. Same thing. In short, gravity at a black-hole level would expand this in less than a blink of an eye and as dense as possible, and would only send you on the trip if something else was going to match it and pull you out the same way. Of course, there would be no heat because there is not light. But that's another story...

Hope that made sense. -HJ


Neo   July 9th, 2009 10:38 pm ET

You all arguing about theories don't waist too much of your life trying to figured out this things that are impossible to answer instead spend your time to see if God really exist if you find the answer and you are 100% sure (like I am) you'll find that those theories are just that and God not. He is more real than a white is or black hole he is the creator of those holes, which is even more complex than holes.

The Big Ban cannot be proven, none was there, and you will ask were you there when things were created. The answers is of course no, but science (real science) no evolution (which is another thing based on theories not proven) has never, never, never, disagree with the Bible.

Thant's is the reason why I’m telling you, do your homework, study, do your research and figure things out by yourself instead of believing a PH.D guy that you read in a magazine or TV,


PHilOsoPhe   July 10th, 2009 11:09 am ET

Neo: For using a name that means "new", you are sure using an old argument. God is no more real than the spaghetti monster. Welcome to the information age. Mathematics is my "God".

Now, back to the "holes". My question is why do white holes and black holes have to be linked. They could very well be mutually exclusive phenomena. From my understanding there are 3 important things right now that are theorized but not proven. 1) Dark Matter 2) Dark Energy and 3) The "god particle" or Higgs field.

Dark matter has been theorized to explain why galaxies spin faster than the mass they contain should allow.

Dark Energy has been theorized to explain why the whole universe is expanding faster and faster as time continues rather than contracting upon itself as was first assumed.

The "god particle" is something that happened microseconds after the Big Bang to give mass to anything and everything that has it in the universe. Before then, there was no mass.

I bring these up because they all seem to be related by mass. Mass should make the universe contract but it doesn't. Based on observations galaxies should spin slower, but they don't. And what gave mass to begin with?

A giant white hole in the center of the universe could explain the dark energy. Picture a person putting a hose, opening flat against a nearly frictionless surface (there's no friction in a vaccuum, correct?) and then turning the water on. As long as there is something coming out of that hose, the first water out will continue moving further and further away from the source. If the space the hose is placed in is smaller than the amount of water flowing into it, the first water will move faster and faster and faster. Now, was there space at all before the big bang or was it created by necessity as something approached nothing?

However, one equation of string theory, if used to imagine the universe contracting to a certain size, would show that the universe would act like it is expanding. Basically, bouncing back from being collapsed. Perhaps that does the job of explaining Dark Energy.


andy sunderland   July 12th, 2009 12:49 am ET

the white hole is the other side of the black hole. The Exit


Korgath   July 14th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

White holes can be used to fuel our Starships during our Milky Way Campaign. But we need to act fast to harvest their power before the Galactic Space Federation does.


randomperson123   July 15th, 2009 1:22 am ET

the only way that the scientist in this article could make the statement "...it doesn't happen in real black holes" implies that he's experimented with black holes AND in order for that statement to be valid, he would have had to know where the white hole was. it could be anywhere in the universe, this guy has no clue what he's talking about. unless he's buzz lightyear, obviously


Wally   July 15th, 2009 2:32 pm ET

I confess I didnt read all the entries I jumped to the end so I could post one. Are there any Star Trek episodes about black holes? Did you know the USS Enterprise is fueled by anti-matter...


zhang   July 19th, 2009 10:41 pm ET

thinking about black and white holes. if the white hole is the exit of black hole than there are some sort of explanation. would it be some transportation?


Live   October 22nd, 2009 11:40 am ET

Given the theory that white holes are a giant, inter-cosmic explosion from a black hole, then theoretically, the Big Bang could possibly be proven. However, if a supermassive black hole were to explode, we, as human beings, would not become aware of it. Why? Because we'd all be dead by the time the light of the nova reaches our planet.

If we survive such a astronomical explosion, and if the theory of Big Bang = White Hole is true, then we'd be looking at the formation of another universe.

This is just my summery, I didn't read all of the comments above, just enough to where the Theory of Big Bang = White Hole was mentioned.


Darrell Williams   November 11th, 2009 1:47 pm ET

White holes are the propulsion or engines that's why black holes have to be so massive and be so powerful as much as they suck in,an equal and opposite push happens,so the universe keeps accelerating,as does anything in space will....


Darrell Williams   November 11th, 2009 2:38 pm ET

maybe that's why there's always a supermassive black hole at the center of every universe,for energy to come out and propel these universes,since we know nature is perfect and practical and base,always,there must be a simple explanation,matter can't be destroyed,so maybe,balckholes arre massive recycling bins,drawing space in,actually,space collapsing upon itself and recycling the matter into new matter or universes maybe ,no,it would have to be in another dimension,it certainly can't be recycling and spitting all of this stuff into the same place it is cleansing,and into another part of space doesn't make sense it could just do it right there in nthe same galaxy or space since this thing is so intricately balanced that when one thing collapses or goes nova nothing is thrown out of balance,so blackholes are creating new galaxys in different dimension,made of equal and opposite matter,simply converted by the blackhole..since it can't be the same matter to come out the white hole that went into the blackhole,it can't exist on this plane..i.e.,another dimension another universe is formed that is equal and opposite sincce that blackhole is at the center of the universe,day one the blackhole started,tit was sucking in itself and making a anti-universe or dimension existing by or near or with the original at the same time,like a negative from a picture,of course this other universe should be as functional as us and maybe that's why space has to be so big with every galaxy having a negative(if you will)maybe that's why the universe has to keep expanding,to make room for every galaxy and it's double,not twin becase the other galaxy exists on a nother plane ...and like I said,if nothing else nature is efficent,so ,if nature makes,differnt dimensions,there's probably a way to get there,not wormholes but rather actually ,travel into a blackhole might not destroy or kill,might be like the eye of a tornado or hurricane,all this force and destruction,mere inches away but in the center perfectly balenced and controlled because with so much fury on the outside,the center is complteely balanced and preserved.....so you travel down the center of the black hole and you go into another dimension...a double of the other universe...so eventually,every part of our universe will go through the blackhole and come out the otheer side including the planets and start from the beginning all over again,into the black hole and out of the whitehole,i.e.,let there be light and we will start all over again,with a few billion years of universe,then life forms,stays a while and gets eaten up by the blackhole again,whether life is on a planet when it happens or it's between ice ages with no life,who knows,who cares but it will and this is how it happens over and over, ad infinitum......


EMPulse   November 15th, 2009 5:58 am ET

PHilOsoPhe began a good explanation of some thoughts and ideas I also had surrounding the theory of "white holes" and the phenomena of alternate universes.

I like to consider that not only are white/black holes mutually exclusive singularities, but also motivated by opposite attractors. While we are searching for existence of theoretical dark matter and dark energy, couldn't it be reasonable to suggest that just as there are black holes consuming the matter and energy of our universe, that there might also be "white holes" that continuously expel dark energy and dark matter particles into it like a quantum field-fluctuating astrophysical fountain? If so, then would such things be the "waste" products of another universe (or whatever you want to call it) that receives our black hole material through energy fountains of its own?

If that's the case, it would be apparent to note that such "white holes" have yet to be detected because we have yet to observe verifiable proof of dark matter/energy in our own universe. With one would come the other. Perhaps the discovery and observation of the Higgs boson and evidence of scalar fields in studies of quantum mechanics could answer some of these questions for us.


Danny   November 19th, 2009 12:02 am ET

We must remember white holes are purely theoretical, we have no evidence nor reason to believe they exist aside from the theory that what goes in someplace – the black hole – must come out in the same form in another place – the white hole. I think this is just an unsophisticated, primitive way of looking out things. Maybe black holes simply "tear" an item apart, breaking it down into it's most simple structure – the atom. Also, black holes are not necessarily "worm holes" or "tunnels" but may just be something that's influence covers such and such an area and anything within that area is simply broken down into atoms, and the atoms go wherever they physically fit.


JOSHHANLON   December 15th, 2009 12:58 am ET

these people are all very smart. i have just barely even scratched the surface of all this in physics 1 and it intreaques me imensely. chemistry dealt with small particles, where i wasnt concerned, yet huge particles like stars are over 1millino times the size of our earth and that is just in our region of space, not or aolar system, but in our galaxy, and to think that there is many galaxies is incredible. i belive that all of this exists, out in many galazies. the conversastion that went n today in class was, there are no religious science teachers. i would lovefor this to change becauz through a very unlegalistic view of religion we can all agree. and i would love to learn way more on this topic and expand my knowlage.


beckyblue   January 18th, 2010 12:29 am ET

Insults are never appropriate when discussing physics and speculating about the nature of things. Truth is, there's more we do not know and never will know, than what we know and can know. So, we have quasars on the order of billions of stars of mass, condensed into a super massive black hole the size of our solar system, traveling at 98.7 % the speed of light, meaning matter at the equator takes abouy 26 hours to travel a circumferance equivalent to neptunes orbit around our sun. Centrifugal force wants to spew out matter, like a white hole.. but the gasses at the accretion disk create a magnetic field around the black hole. matter spirals in toward the event horizon, and centrifugal force pushes it back out, and magnetic field lines pull the matter up the poles, shooting out enormous jets. Think of DRAGNS, where a pair of ionized gas lobes form at the ends of the poles, millions of light years across, 10 times the diameter of our Milky Way. These lobes are sparking new stars like a hatchery, and may develop into galaxies (?). For a white hole to exist, the centrifugal force would have to be able to overcome gravity and spew the matter out, i.e. a quasar being ripped apart into a spiral galaxy. While this sounds good, the magnetic properties of super massive black holes will always direct the matter up the poles and out as jets. Soooooo that's my take on white holes.


the beds   April 26th, 2010 2:34 pm ET

the beds the beds the beds


Dr. Krishna Vinjamuri, Nuclear Engineer   April 30th, 2010 2:05 am ET

Primeval Event theory: Krishna Vinjamur’s latest version of the Big Bang model in which all the events in the Universe were originally connected to one compact primeval event. The explosion of the primeval event initiated the universe.
Our Universe is about 10E26m radius, and (13.7x10E9 years. x 31557600 s/yr=) 4.32 10E17 seconds old (long) light cone. It evolved from a primordial white hole cone of 1.61 x 10-35 m radius and 5.37 x 10-44 axial length. Or evolved from a primordial Planck event of 2.24 10-142cm3-sec. The whole universe is nothing but an integral sum of 1.81 10E240 primordial Event light cones (▼).
Evolution of our Universe: Our eventful universe was evolved or tunneled from a primordial black hole to a primordial white hole. It evolved almost at the end of the primordial black hole as a primordial fluctuation of quantum spacetime.Copy Riight: Krishna Vinjamuri


Chris   March 1st, 2012 6:17 pm ET

My theory is that white holes are made out of flubber.


global regulatory specialists   April 7th, 2012 11:27 pm ET

Generally I do not read post on blogs, however I would like to say that this write-up very pressured me to try and do so! Your writing style has been amazed me. Thanks, very great post.


JDaniel   February 26th, 2013 6:27 pm ET

if white holes eject matter/energy out of nothing then wouldnt that prove the law of conservation of matte/energy wrong?


Nehemiah Stewart   April 4th, 2013 12:57 pm ET

Is it possible for a white hole to destroy a blak hole by inverting upon itself in a physical way of thinking. Or could we use a white hole and black hole in an artificial environment to form a new way of transportation or are black holes to wide scale and unknown for this to ever happen.


Nehemiah Stewart   April 4th, 2013 1:04 pm ET

Could white holes just be the electromagnetic flares that black holes emit as proved in Steven hawkings theory. So it is plausible that white holes are real and since they are magnetic and a previous part of black holes they could be a gateway from one into the other.


Dave   April 3rd, 2014 1:35 pm ET

It's appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it's time to be happy. I've read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you few interesting things or tips. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article. I want to read even more things about it!


Leave Your Comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Are you a gadgethead? Do you spend hours a day online? Or are you just curious about how technology impacts your life? In this digital age, it's increasingly important to be fluent, or at least familiar, with the big tech trends. From gadgets to Google, smartphones to social media, this blog will help keep you informed.

subscribe RSS Icon
twitter
Powered by WordPress.com VIP