In an attempt to generate new revenue, the Associated Press has partnered with iCopyright to charge licensing fees for quotes as short as five words.
Quoting 5 words from an Associated Press story costs $12.50.
When linking to articles, news aggregators and bloggers commonly include excerpts to provoke discussion.
I understand the AP's desire to protect its content, but the decision to charge for excerpts that include links to its articles has me scratching my head. Without outside links to generate interest and drive traffic, what will happen to AP content online?
Ben Parr from Mashable weighs in:
The company’s complaint is that blogs and news aggregators (i.e. Google News) are taking its content and making all the advertising revenue. What they forget is that they provide a great deal of traffic and attention to content creators in the process.
Under the AP's licensing system, I would owe Mashable $25 for that quote. But more likely, I would have ignored Parr's article altogether to avoid paying a fee, and Mashable would have lost traffic.
In a statement released Monday, the Associated Press claims the licensing "form is not aimed at bloggers. It is intended to make it easy for people who want to license AP content to do so."
Bloggers may not be the primary targets, but vague licensing terms leave open the frightening prospect of legal action against anyone who quotes an AP article.
Executives at the AP are shooting themselves in the foot with this decision. Bloggers and aggregators are the best source of free advertising, and the traffic they generate is worth much more than $2.50 per word.
And you can quote me on that.
Posted by: Wes Finley-Price -- CNN.com WebmasterFiled under: Internet online news technology
Associated Press seems to think that cash grows like weeds, and coins fall like rain... Where will this stop? Will the AP, put a censor machine on us, if we say a quote in public, and can not pay for it?
That argument sure sounds familiar but the truth is that blogs and news aggregators provide little if any traffic to the main source and instead end up reaping the benefits of ripping off content through increased traffic to their own site and advertising revenue.
Write your own damn content and quit stealing from others. Just because it is on the net doesn't mean that it's free.
The AP finally wants to cash in on all those internet dollars huh? Didn't Canada try to do the same thing in an episode of Southpark? How did that turn out for em?
"Fair Use" is still a part of copyright law. The AP can't change the law by publishing a new rate schedule. However, maybe we should grant it's wish and stop quoting their articles, and linking to them, and talking about them.
There may be more to this than meets the eye. Some very powerful people have a great deal of power over the AP and major media outlets, and they would very much like to put the chill on blogs, which sometimes highlight small bits of news that many people would like to bury. He who controls the information, controls the world.
As noted on Slashdot: (2009/08/03) AP Will Sell You a "License" To Words It Doesn't Own.
Used 26 words written by Thomas Jefferson 196 years ago: If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea. The AP cheerfully charged him $12 to use Jefferson's 26 words.
We are officially the greediest people on the planet
This is just plain stupid how greedy are people going to get in the US? I have an idea I'm going to start charging people for every one of my posts that someone reads no matter what it's on facebook, twitter, myspace, blog sites, message boards, news sites, and any IM service that I may use, I'll make millions... or people just won't read what I wrote.
This was all predicted about five years ago in a hypothetically "historical" flash movie called "Epic 2014" which follows the supposed "merger" of Google and Amazon. However, with tools like Twitter, Facebook, iPhone, etc. this is sounding eerily familiar. So if you think it can't happen, read the following excerpt:
"The News Wars of 2010 are notable for the fact that no actual news organizations take part.
"Googlezon finally checkmates Microsoft with features the software giant cannot match. Using a new algorithm, Googlezon’s computers construct news stories dynamically, stripping sentences and facts from all content sources and recombining them. The computer writes a news story for every user.
"In 2011, the slumbering Fourth Estate awakes to make its first and final stand. The New York Times Company sues Googlezon, claiming that the company’s fact-stripping robots are a violation of copyright law. The case goes all the way to the Supreme Court, which on August 4, 2011 decides in favour of Googlezon.
"On Sunday, March 9 2014, Googlezon unleashes EPIC.
"Welcome to our world.
"The ‘Evolving Personalized Information Construct’ is the system by which our sprawling, chaotic mediascape is filtered, ordered and delivered. Everyone contributes now – from blog entries, to phone-cam images, to video reports, to full investigations. Many people get paid too – a tiny cut of Googlezon’s immense advertising revenue, proportional to the popularity of their contributions.
"EPIC produces a custom contents package for each user, using his choices, his consumption habits, his interests, his demographics, his social network – to shape the product.
"A new generation of freelance editors has sprung up, people who sell their ability to connect, filter and prioritize the contents of EPIC.
"We all subscribe to many Editors; EPIC allows us to mix and match their choices however we like. At its best, edited for the savviest readers, EPIC is a summary of the world – deeper, broader and more nuanced than anything ever available before. " – EPIC 2014
Well, it's a state run news agency, what do you expect? The federal government wants to charge us extra for everything...
Here's a link. The most recent version is actually called "Epic 2015".
Correction – Just because it's on the net DOES mean it's free! Free from royalties so long as you give credit and don't plagarize.
Isn't the WHOLE point of the press to report facts and quote people when necessary? So every time the AP quotes Obama, do they owe him $0.50 per word? And if I quote them quoting him, do I owe them, him, or no one since the debt was paid on the original quote? See how stupid this is?
When it comes to blogs, just about anything can be published WITHOUT paying anything. Good luck sicking your legal dogs on thousands or millions of supposed offenders. If you want revenue, try the subscription approach (and see how long your business lasts Mr. Murdoch).
Is the AP willing to pay $2.50 for every word it quotes in its reports? I dobut it. Don't create a standard you cannot live up to yourself.
Although I think the fees are a bit high, it's a good way to get journalists back to writing their own articles(unless they are still too lazy and would rather pay). Too many times have I gone to the "news" websites and read the same article word for word from the AP. I want different points of view when I read from CNN.com or it's online competitors. If it's just going to be same story cut and pasted, I'll just go to to AP and ignore the other outlets who are using the AP for their own news source rather than coming up with a creative article on their own..
Let them do what they want to do. Aggregators are just going to go elsewhere to get their information - even if may eventually mean going to foreign presses and sources.
By way of background, the Excerpt License via iCopyright was developed at the request of corp users who wished to excerpt portions of an article for reprinting, posting and use in PowerPoint presentations. These users did not want to include parts of the article that mentioned their competitors, or were otherwise irrelevant for their purposes.
It is also important to note that iCopyright does not choose the services, the terms, or the prices of any of the licenses that its system processes for publishers. If publishers decide to offer an Excerpt License, they choose the terms and prices of that license (incl how many words may be excerpted, the min and max). They own the content, not iCopyright. In the same way that PayPal has no control over the value or terms of an item that is purchased through its gateway, iCopyright has no control over the value and terms of a piece of content licensed through its gateway.
It is a fundamental principle of iCopyright to be agnostic with respect to the content our service is used on and the rules the owner has associated with the reuse of that content. iCopyright is a technology. It does not set copyright guidelines. It does not enforce copyright. It simply makes it possible for people to easily use and share content under the rules set up by the owners.
At least they had a good run while it lasted. lol! Bye bye AP.
Southpark is quite funny but some of the scenes maybe a bit too morbid even for adults.-~;
Ve haf vays uf MAKKING you taaalk, Here Crippen. Vere is de XBOX?
(crummy impersonation of GERMAN GESTAPO).
So, the GOVERNMENT can strip search you at airports, take naked pictures of you, limit your rights, but dont you dare try and modify and XBOX.
I would like to thank you for this wonderful site!! I undoubtedly enjoyed every little bit of it. I look forward to seeing what else you post. Thanks
My brother recommended this website to me. He said that it was really excellent, and I think he is right! This post definately made me think.
Great blog here! Also your website loads up very fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol
Magnificent web site. A lot of useful information here. I'm sending it to some buddies ans additionally sharing in delicious. And naturally, thank you in your effort!
内インサイド その他を通して追加いくつかのその他その他の様々な コレクション選択選択シリーズ、 大胆な印象スタイル レイアウト デザイン強力なデザインとスタイル たなってしまった 戻るされましたされていた再び再び。後部 ポール·スミスデザイナー 使用利用採用利用 色色シェードと着色 に沿ってとと共に使用 男性マンリー強いマッチョ 自信自信自信自己信頼 実際特定あなたのイギリスイギリス英語イギリス デザイナーカスタム開発者アーティスト 擁護ザ任意新しい 鮮やか活気ブリリアントまぶしいパレット配色色パレットブランドの新しいの 新しいとカラースキームを持つすべての新しい一度プレゼントニンジン形状フォーム条件設計 シルエット会社概要形状図内の内部 内全域 ズボンパンツスラックスジーンズ 中インサイド 内の内部 最強最も強力な最も堅牢なベスト 表示ディスプレイ現在を実演日の日中日日を通して フランス語フランスフランス人この特定の言語 家ホーム住居プロパティー、ランバンふてくされ確かにトレンド人気話題興奮 喜んだのに関してについてに関連する春夏とほかまた、 に沿ってとたのように行くことを進ん旅し行っモノクログレー黒と白非着色されたドキュメント。
you are really a good webmaster. The website loading speed is amazing. It seems that you are doing any unique trick. Moreover, The contents are masterwork. you have done a great job on this topic!
addicting games http://www.addictinggamesabc.com
Notify me of new comments via email.
Are you a gadgethead? Do you spend hours a day online? Or are you just curious about how technology impacts your life? In this digital age, it's increasingly important to be fluent, or at least familiar, with the big tech trends. From gadgets to Google, smartphones to social media, this blog will help keep you informed.