SciTechBlog   « Back to Blog Main
August 17, 2009

Study: 40 percent of Twitter is babble

Posted: 09:21 AM ET

These findings may disturb some of you hard-core social networkers: A market research firm says 40 percent of tweets are "pointless babble."

Pear Analytics analyzed random tweets over a two-week period and used that data to funnel the posts into six categories. More on the process:

So we took 2,000 tweets from the public timeline (in English and in the US) over a 2-week period from 11:00a to 5:00p (CST) and captured tweets in half-hour increments. Then we categorized them into 6 buckets:

News, Spam, Self-Promotion, Pointless Babble, Conversational and Pass-Along Value.

"Conversational" tweets came in second place and made up nearly 38 percent of the posts analyzed. Researchers say they went into the project thinking that Twitter was mostly used for self-promotion.

The firm concludes that, because of all of the babble, people who still want to use Twitter need some way to filter out irrelevant information. It seems like it's easier to me just to follow people who you trust and who you find interesting.  More from the report:

With the new face of Twitter, it will be interesting to see if they take a heavier role in news, or continue to be a source for people to share their current activities that have little to do with everyone else.  We will be conducting this same study every quarter to identify other trends in usage.

Since Twitter is still loaded with lots of babbling that not many of have time for, you should check out the Twitter filter, Philtro.  These guys can not only help you filter the noise, but will also be allowing you to store the tweets you are most interested in real soon.

Here's another report on the state of Twitter, visualized by Gizmodo. The blog has a nice chart of what Twitter would look like if there were only 100 Twitter users in the world (The blog got its data from an upcoming book, "Visualized, the Information Atlas," by David McCandless). Half are classified as "lazy," meaning they haven't posted in the last week. Only 5 percent of users have more than 100 followers, according to the analysis.

What do you all think? Is Twitter overrun with babble? I've sensed a lot of why-is-CNN-so-obsessed-with-Twitter? heat in the comments lately, so I'd love to know what you all think about this!

Posted by:
Filed under: Twitter


Share this on:
KevinT   August 17th, 2009 9:49 am ET

I would say that it is more like 90% is inane babbling.. get outside people and actually interact with real people..


John   August 17th, 2009 10:43 am ET

The entire idea of this revolution in networking sites is just a fad and will die off soon. Once most of the world grows up and realizes how worthless the information is on these sites.


craig   August 17th, 2009 10:45 am ET

twitter is stupid. it's for idiots who actually think people care what they're doing (celebrities included)

why is CNN obsessed with this mindless web 2.0 bull.
They must have invested in them or something.


Justin   August 17th, 2009 11:08 am ET

I have been a Twitter user for about 2 years and I don't really understand what "point" this firm is trying to make. I use Twitter to the same goal as other Web 2.0 social networking sites – to exchange communication with people I actually know. This means I'm perfectly fine with some inane babble, because it's inane babbling from people I know, thus interesting at least to see that they feel the need to babble inanely (which can have deeper implications).

Also, I'm perfectly fine having less than 100 followers, if my followers are people I know, who cares how many of them there are? To me becoming follower obsessed would ruin the point of it all.

I feel like firms like this and media outlets like CNN spend so much time trying to quantify and analyze Twitter (and Facebook, MySpace, et al) that they miss the entire point.


Anthony   August 17th, 2009 11:17 am ET

One could argue that 40% of all communication is inane babble. I follow primarly other I.T. types on twitter, and the signal-to-noise is very high, the majority of it being actual information, or interesting observations.
Saying that Twitter carries no useful communication by looking at the unfiltered public timeline would be like standing in the middle of an intersection at rush hour and denigrating the people bustling about for not engaging you with intricate and meaningful discussion.


Matthew   August 17th, 2009 11:36 am ET

Twitter is by definition 100% babble. What a waste of time.


John   August 17th, 2009 11:44 am ET

I think the main reason I would love to see these sites go away is people are texting comments while they are driving down the highway at 70 mph. I see people walking down the street, in shopping malls and standing in line fixed to their little machines texing away as if they have no other life to lead. In my opinion, it is very sad...


Wayne   August 17th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

I never used Twitter and never will. I don't get it – the little odds and ends of my life are private and what helps define the differences in my life from that of my neighbor. I see Twitter as a vehicle for self-promotion babble talk; an extension of status updates on Facebook.


Brian   August 17th, 2009 1:15 pm ET

I keep up with some family members/friends

I seldom touch the thing outside of sitting at home for a spell and chatting up some friends.

Otherwise, I usually subscribe to the more meaningful informational feeds.

They could be de-emphasized a bit. I used to feel bad about playing online games all the time 10 years ago. I never thought they'd trump the waste of time factor with these "social" networking sites.


Vincent Clark   August 17th, 2009 1:35 pm ET

First of all, Twitter is more in the Web 3.0 || ITNG, but that is just semantics. I agree very much with Justin. To each is own, what works for one person may not work for CNN. Which the only way for CNN to view anything especially Twitter is through CNN eyes. Twitter is a free service that operates within its rules. Use it or don't, it isn't mandated that you do. If you cannot tolerate the babel or you think it is lame don't use it. Very simple. Heck I think 90% of what is on CNN is babel so I only pay attention to the 10% of information that interests me.


Arun   August 17th, 2009 2:39 pm ET

I have a Twitter account and I use it for (1) keeping in touch with my close friends and relatives/family members without having to log into multiple chat clients (2) get up-to-date news or information directly from a handful of providers without having to subscribe to their news feeds or latest headlines.

The point I am trying to make is it is up to the individual to subscribe to or contribute to the "babble" – the technology is so powerful and flexible that it can be used in so many different ways. People are still learning and getting a feel of it and it is too early to judge the usefulness of such social networking tools. You have the option to unsubscribe from the "babble" if it bothers you – no body is forcing you to subscribe to all the users who are on Twitter. What is nonsense for me may be useful information for you. Use it in ways that suits your needs.


SWAW   August 17th, 2009 2:44 pm ET

I do not know a whole lot about twitter. However, at my age it is not too difficult to put two and two together and figure out many things with common sense and the amount of life experiences I have been through. So, I would say, that mostly likely the "babble" we are seeing in twitter perhaps comes from the situation with money these days. I mean, one can unload their entire lifetime of random thoughts over a relatively short time using twitter as a free replacement for an expensive psychiatrists... This comment however, is not the result of just a random thought, or is it?


SWAW   August 17th, 2009 2:53 pm ET

Ooop[s! meant to say "most likely" not "mostly likely" –


Brent, Calgary, AB   August 17th, 2009 2:54 pm ET

I'm with Craig, when CNN started to insist that anyone who might be texting or even looking at their cell phone were "Twittering" (tweeting?) and insisting that it was some kind of "revolution" I too became suspicious that there was some kind of promotion for monetary gain for CNN involved.

And for anyone to think that because you have a “Twitter following” that anyone really cares what you’re doing is so ridiculous it’s hard to believe anyone does this sort of thing seriously. It’s like those people who update there status on Facebook every 5-minutes. “I’m going to the store, back in 5”, “I’m back from the store”, “I’m reading a book”, “Now I’m not reading a book”, “I’m so tired”. Sheesh!

As for Samuel L. Jackson... "I AM SO BORED RIGHT NOW." Who really gives a damn??? Frankly Samuel… I don’t!


John   August 17th, 2009 2:58 pm ET

I don't have a problem with people babbling, but when I see them doing it while driving their car...somethings got to go!


mkrtown   August 17th, 2009 3:09 pm ET

I use Twitter. Occasionally and for the life of me have no idea why? Just to be 'in' the craze?

Do you think they'll come a time when people are face to face Tweeting to each other instead of talking?


Jordan   August 17th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

I get a kick out of all the people who hate twitter. It's a website that facilitates a certain form of communication. How can you hate it? That's like saying that you hate telecommunications, because most of the people who talk on the phone aren't having interesting conversations.

What I hate is that companies like CNN rely on Twitter as a source of news. It does seem that way more than 40% of the posts on Twitter are just people posting about the current Twittering Trends, but not adding anything of value. But don't hate the messenger. It takes very little effort to find the kind of content that you want to see on Twitter and filter out the rest of the crap.

It almost seems like people spend their time seeking out bad things, just to complain when they find them.


JD   August 17th, 2009 4:05 pm ET

I use Twitter, but not for the usual reasons as described in this article.

First, my account is locked. Only people I approve can follow my tweets.

Second, I use Twitter as a convenient and cost-effective way to message friends and colleagues on new developments, departures, arrivals and time commitments. Let's face it: Twitter is a LOT cheaper than the ridiculous rates that mobile phone companies charge for texting!

Finally, I only follow a few celebrities (such members of the Mythbusters) since they occasionally have interesting things to say.


ChrisDG74   August 17th, 2009 4:39 pm ET

40 percent?? Try 99.999999%. I could not care less if someone is "bored right now" or needs to "drop a deuce".


john metzger   August 17th, 2009 5:27 pm ET

It's use a a a ME-tool is just nuts. Anyone who has the time to waste on that is deserving.

It could be a very important tool to use in certain situations , b ut how do you direct that message.

A group of twitterers might actually have something worth following, but one off's ?

Google has years of emails and posts from forums available, tons of info there, but who cares???


azhira   August 17th, 2009 5:43 pm ET

Those of you who think it's pointless don't get it. That's fine, it's not your thing. It's a nice peak into the daily goings-ons of people I already know. I care about what they say *because* I know them. So what if it seems like mindless chatter to everyone else?


Webolutions.com   August 17th, 2009 6:02 pm ET

This is why it is so essential to give value when you are Tweeting.


Rick   August 17th, 2009 6:32 pm ET

How is it that some people can proclaim that Twitter is a waste of time, yet sit at their computers on comment on a blog posting?


brandon   August 17th, 2009 6:49 pm ET

100 percent of twitter is crap...get over it people the site sucks..twit that


kita b   August 17th, 2009 8:46 pm ET

the worst part of twitter isn't those who post crap it's those who actually care enough to read the crap its really bad if they keep up with it on a constant basis


SilentBoy741   August 17th, 2009 10:02 pm ET

Actually, I'd say "Conversational" is very close to "Pointless Babble", enough that they could be considered the same. This brings the total for Pointless Babble up to about 78%, I believe a much more realistic reading on the Twit-O-Meter. Add in Spam and Self-Promotion (clearly just other forms of pointless babble), and you start to peg around 90 or 95 per cent. That sounds about right.


David   August 17th, 2009 10:22 pm ET

I agree with the commenter who said "isn't 40% of what CNN has to say just useless babble?" Celebrity "news" and junk articles (this one included) discussing the latest fads are just huuuuuge wastes of time!


jkramer   August 17th, 2009 11:09 pm ET

I'm surprised the number is so low, I'd have guessed at least 80%.


CharLLL   August 17th, 2009 11:37 pm ET

CNN: TWITTER IS A FAD.
STOP REPORTING ON IT.

Wow, really, 40% of all communication limited to 140 characters is babble? Jesus christ that's the most obvious statement ever. I would've guessed it's even higher.

Are you guys taking money from Twitter for marketing purposes? Or did you just fall in love once you were forced to rely on it to report from Iran?


AdamtheIA   August 18th, 2009 12:05 am ET

Sounds like a reasearch firm tryng to get some press by weighing-in on something that's already getting press.

To agree with Justin; if you don't know the people you're following and vice-versa, the content can't be much more than mundane. If you were to eaves-drop on the average conversations you hear in a cafe or train, I'm guessing it would sound...oh, I don't know... inane – go figure!

This resaerch was done from a flawed position. No other conclusion could be reached.

But hey, you got your name on the news and you've incited a bunch of people like me to stir up the disucssion even if it is to point out the ridiculousness of your premise.


Jeremy Woolf   August 18th, 2009 12:12 am ET

Interesting article – but I think folks are missing the point. Simply analysing the public timeline is like trying to listen to thousands of simultaneous radio broadcasts. Undeniably babble. Twitter can – and should – be filtered. I've blogged on this over here:

http://publicrelationships.blogspot.com/2009/08/shock-horror-40-of-tweets-on-twitter.html


Admiral Nasmith   August 18th, 2009 6:51 am ET

Ironic... It seems that with the majority of social networking sites do contain people who:

1. Do mindless babbling, especially with status updates (I'm talking about you Facebook!).

2. Do what can be deemed "time-wasting", as they have other responsibilities they are ignoring (Procrastination).

" Samuel L. Jackson, what are you doing right now?"
"I am so bored right now..."
Do we care? (No)

Nowadays, it seems that the internet is being used differently then the principles it was designed for: Productivity, Collaboration, and Reference.

Imagine if that 40% was used productivity? Peoples, our ever so precious bandwidth is being used up by mumbling idiots. Society would collapse if everyone was wasting time on Social Networking. These people have a negative effect on everyone as a whole.

Unfortunately, it would be against all moral law, by, as to speak, "remove these guys form the gene pool".

Just make sure all your "tweets" are as informative as possible, meaningful, and productive.


Safety Guru   August 18th, 2009 6:54 am ET

Remember kids, don't drive and "tweet" at the same time. You endanger us all.

Oh, and don't "tweet" and cross the road, too. They won't stop for you...


John   August 18th, 2009 8:24 am ET

There always has to be a new Fad, and Twitter is just that. A new fad for those with no life and lots of time on their hands...


Greg   August 18th, 2009 9:55 am ET

I'm with Justin & Vincent.

I use twitter, and have been for about 6 months. I follow a select group of news outlets (including BBC, NYT, NewScientist, Accuweather, NASA) who provide daily stories that I would otherwise have to seek out, and close friends who have twitter accounts. As with any social networking I follow these people because I like to see what is going on in their lives, and anything they post including the pointless babble is for the most part worth reading. If you would listen to the person talking about it in the same room it's just like reading it on twitter. While writing this my friend just tweeted "Going to another boring meeting!", pointless babble to 99.9% of the world? YES. Pointless to me, NO. I gain a little insight into my friends life and the exact reason I follow him and have a twitter account of my own.

To those who don't have a twitter account: you have no right to put me, or anyone else, down for having a twitter account. I indeed have a busy life and lot of friends, I don't by any means consider my twitter "following" to mean anything (it's only about 15 people anyway) other than the list of my friends who like to see what I'm up to once in a while.


Dave Anderson   August 18th, 2009 10:06 am ET

Your headline should read "ONLY 40% Babble" I would have guessed that twitter is about 99.9% babble.


Tara Deck   August 18th, 2009 11:52 am ET

There is better technology out there now that offers the same benefits as twitter but without the babble – Mashable recently highlighted Obayoo – which has the live stream feature plus secure file exchange and chat options – but is geared more towards business and organizations. Twitter will fade to the background as more secure networking applications become available.


AntiTwitter   August 18th, 2009 4:01 pm ET

More like 99.999995% of Tweets are completely useless. I know personally I very rarely have anything relevant to say. Including this post...completely useless and self indulgent. This post like 99.999995% of all other online comments do not effect society in a positive way ever. If anything at all tweets only give us a glimpse into how much time we are actually non-productive.


Nathan Sokalski   August 18th, 2009 4:17 pm ET

What is babble and what is not is more of an opinion that anything else. I hate Twitter completely, so I would get rid of it completely and forever, but if other people enjoy it then I guess I have no reason to say they shouldn't be allowed to use and enjoy it.


Don   August 18th, 2009 4:44 pm ET

I agree I would have to say 99.9999% is babble.

Case in point.
"Just had *ice* in my drink! #littlethings"


Bob   August 18th, 2009 5:54 pm ET

I also have a twitter account but don't follow anyone. I think I have a few followers. I actually use twitter as a convenient place to send my bicycle riding stats to.. I keep track of how many miles I ride, my average speed, and time riding. At the end of the mountain bike season, I will have a complete history of all my riding activity. That's what I use twitter for.


Scott Gallagher   August 18th, 2009 6:58 pm ET

WOW. Mindless people here. I'd say over 40% of the posts here are babble.

I use Twitter daily for business. I have met new clients through Twitter. At a recent conference, Twiiter got me noticed by an exec at a large telecom. I've even was introduce to one my programmers through Twitter.

It's not a fad. It's just another way to communicate. You all said that about email, social sites and even the computer in 1942. Heck, didn't a presidnet say in 1890's everything that can be invented is invented.

Those people that are closed about Twitter obviously aren't innovators nor leaders.


Fred   August 19th, 2009 12:02 am ET

Twitter, Facebook and the other social sites are just a fad and will eventually die out or drop off. They give users a short-lived but exciting sense of something new...like dating someone new...but eventually the 'newness' wears off.

How they will monetize over the long haul is still unknown.

Once our economy picks up, or people are busier; they will find they have little time to follow others babble.


Phil   August 19th, 2009 10:42 am ET

What exactly is the point of twitter again? I signed up for twitter just so that I could "tweet" or whatever, saying that I was not using twitter. That post is still accurate and will be forever.

If you want to know whats going on in the world, read a newspaper. If you want to know what your friends are up to, call them. Its simple.

Also, most twitter users probably had a facebook first, right? Were facebook's status updates not good enough for people? Now people aparently need facebook AND twitter? I though facebook was pointless enough until this twitter deal came along. How stupid are we?


gm   August 19th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I would say that nearly 100% of Twitter is babble because I really could care less what any of it's users are doing at any given time.


McG   August 19th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

There is nothing 2.0 or 3.0 about Twitter. Anybody remember those old relics things called Chat Rooms? You know, the type you used to be able to get on with your AOL account? That's all it is, one big chat room. An interesting thing about chat rooms that applied back then just as it does now, is that it is 100% worthless babble. Those who say there is anything useful coming out of that things are really just pathetic people who are ver lonely.


Catherine   August 23rd, 2009 1:16 pm ET

I have no personal feelings about any specific social networking site, but, as an educator, find it sad that such a large number of young people (..and some not-so-young) spend innordinate amounts of time engaging in this form of "communication". I fear that reading, writing, and actually talking to other people are becoming passe.


really?   August 24th, 2009 1:13 pm ET

Yeah well phil, I don't think it's a matter of stupid....it's more a matter of sad, these are individuals that are still in highschool. And by stating that they are still in highschool, I'm not implying they're a bunch of teenagers still attending highschool. These are individuals that NEVER left highschool. The ones that have to feel like they're a part of a crowd, or always need the thrill of that little bit of juicy gossip, or pointing and laughing at someone who wore the wrong color shoes with their pants. I call those attention WH**es. These people must always be the center of attention, because in real life they don't have the guts to say half the things they say or imply behind a computer and are nowhere near in real life what they pretend to be on the computer. They NEED to belong to something that will get them the attention they lack in real life.


SarahK   August 24th, 2009 1:22 pm ET

At first, I was doubtful about twitter. I didn't think it could keep my interest. I was wrong. I am a recent college graduate who went to school in one city, now live in another, and studied abroad in Australia. Twitter allows me to share my experiences with those that I care about all over the world. A simple phone call or even email cannot accomplish the same goal with such ease. Also, you choose who to follow. So if you're sick of following someone – just don't. Its that simple.


AC   August 24th, 2009 6:26 pm ET

And Sarah Palin's are 100% gibberish!


justjack45   August 24th, 2009 6:41 pm ET

If you don't like or care about Twitter, don't use it. If you think Facebook is for people who don't have a life, then don't sign up for it. Simple. And I don't believe that Twitter is a fad at all. It's an evolving communications technology that will change and grow over time. I like Twitter AND Facebook. Leave me alone and complain about something else. Excuse me while I update my status!


brandon   August 25th, 2009 11:59 am ET

Im leaving another comment...this one is for all the people that think twitter is worth a crap...every social site has an update box...thats all twitter is , is the update box.....nobody cares what your doing or thinking all day long...if theres important thing to post about buissness or whatever then thats what email is for..if someone has twitter then someone has email....in all reality it so you can post the redundant things inbetween the important things and NOBODY CARES. When will we get to stop hearing how awsome twitter is when it just copied off other sites....get real people


Fred   August 25th, 2009 1:13 pm ET

evolving communications technology....It is nothing but a glorified chat room. the kind AOL started years ago. They just thought up a way of making it a little more interesting by letting the world see everyone babble.


Charlie   August 25th, 2009 1:42 pm ET

The one thing that I am still failing to see is how "Twitter" is a new and evolving technology. All it is is a blog with a character limit. That's it. Bottom line.


brandon   August 26th, 2009 11:12 am ET

charlie is right...this is not new nor gonna evolve into anything....if you think its amazing you should try email sometime! hahaha it amazing to


Judas   August 27th, 2009 11:09 am ET

Twitter...

Is nonesense mainstream BS.

Don't be a Twit. Stop Tweeting.


I’m Not Dead Yet | Blog-Her   September 27th, 2010 4:57 pm ET

[...] one or two a day, not counting replies and re-tweets. I'm not too eager to post personal tweets (pointless babble) much anymore, mostly because I'm not doing anything worth noting. Not that I'm uninterested in [...]


mitchell-johnson   October 10th, 2014 6:31 am ET

It's remarkable to visit this website and reading the views of all mates on the topic of this paragraph, while I
am also zealous of getting experience.


Hotels in europe booking   October 11th, 2014 1:43 pm ET

fantastic put up, very informative. I wonder why the other
experts of this sector do not notice this. You should continue your writing.
I'm confident, you have a huge readers' base already!


www.upominki-reklamowe.biz   October 12th, 2014 5:54 pm ET

Thanks for the marvelous posting! I genuinely enjoyed reading it, you are a great author.I will always bookmark your blog and definitely will come
back at some point. I want to encourage that you continue your great writing, have a nice afternoon!


Phones   January 27th, 2015 9:06 pm ET

Hello would you mind letting me know which hosting company you're using?
I've loaded your blog in 3 completely different internet browsers and
I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most.
Can you suggest a good internet hosting provider at a honest price?

Thank you, I appreciate it!


Leave Your Comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Are you a gadgethead? Do you spend hours a day online? Or are you just curious about how technology impacts your life? In this digital age, it's increasingly important to be fluent, or at least familiar, with the big tech trends. From gadgets to Google, smartphones to social media, this blog will help keep you informed.

subscribe RSS Icon
twitter
Powered by WordPress.com VIP