SciTechBlog   « Back to Blog Main
May 29, 2009

Wikipedia bans Church of Scientology

Posted: 03:47 PM ET

The collaborative online encyclopedia Wikipedia has banned the Church of Scientology from editing the site. The Register reports Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee, or ArbCom, voted 10 to 0 in favor of the ban, which takes effect immediately.

Wikipedia's innovative free-encyclopedia draws upon the knowledge of millions of users to create and edit articles on every conceivable topic. Edits appear immediately and do not undergo any formal peer-review process.

Wikipedia officially prohibits use of the encyclopedia to advance personal agendas – such as advocacy or propaganda and philosophical, ideological or religious dispute – but the open format makes enforcing such policies difficult.

According to Wikipedia administrators speaking to The Register:

Multiple editors have been "openly editing [Scientology-related articles] from Church of Scientology equipment and apparently coordinating their activities."

However, Karin Pouw, with the Church of Scientology's public affairs office, told me she is unaware of any coordinated effort to alter Wikipedia. Instead, she described the edits as individual attempts to correct inaccurate information by impassioned Scientologists and interpreted the ban as a typical Wikipedia response to arguments over content. She noted that even the U.S. Department of Justice received a temporary ban after someone  erased references to a controversial scandal from inside the government agency.

One Wikipedia contributor I spoke with that was involved in the Scientology arbitration agreed that some of the edits coming from the church were justifiable, but insisted the ban was necessary after the church refused to follow Wikipedia's policies:

"The edits coming out of Church of Scientology servers were of the sort that made their organization look better.  Up to a point that's justifiable, when it comes to correcting inaccuracies or removing poorly sourced negative information. There were times when they went beyond that and deleted well sourced information that was unflattering, and there were times when they insulted other editors in a manner that would reflect poorly upon any religion."

Some see Wikipedia's decision as a setback to the Utopian goal of Web 2.0 in which every user is allowed to freely contribute.

How do you feel about the ban? Should Wikipedia actively suppress self-serving, misleading or inaccurate information? Or does every voice deserve to be heard?

<div class="cnnStoryPhotoBox"><img src="" border="0" alt="" width="292" height="219" /></div>

Posted by:
Filed under: Internet • online news • Religion

Share this on:
hydroxychloroquine plaquenil   June 7th, 2021 2:22 pm ET

who produces hydroxychloroquine win resochin hydroxychloroquine eye

Jack Zawasky   June 7th, 2021 3:12 pm ET

This was awesome! I would like you to clean up all this spam though

cibialoh   June 7th, 2021 5:21 pm ET

genericcialis cialis without a perscription is tadalafil the same as cialis

EdumpHtf   June 8th, 2021 1:55 am ET

cialis levitra viagra sample pack buy cialis cheap online cialis ads

EdumpHtf   June 8th, 2021 2:09 am ET

cialis for women reviews cialis in malaysia cialis cost without insurance

EdumpDev   June 8th, 2021 10:50 am ET

viagra online us pharmacy london drugs photo books canada rx to go pharmacy league city

cibialoh   June 8th, 2021 1:34 pm ET

e20 pill cialis cialis samples canada daily cialis review

cibiaVed   June 9th, 2021 1:37 pm ET

does cialis cause skin cancer cialis with dapoxetine 80mg generic cialis uk

cemeSwa   June 9th, 2021 2:51 pm ET

cialis 5mg australia cialis wiki generic cialis 10 mg price cheap

EdumpDev   June 9th, 2021 10:47 pm ET

trustworthy online pharmacy mailing prescription drugs usps online medicine shopping

Efrain Mazell   June 11th, 2021 9:41 am ET

This was great! I would like you to clean up all this spam though

EdumpAni   June 12th, 2021 9:18 am ET

ativan online pharmacy canada reputable canadian mail order pharmacy fry pharmacy lambert and la canada

clozapine   June 12th, 2021 9:20 am ET

how safe is hydroxychloroquine chloroquine phosphate brand name hydroxycholorquine

cibiaVed   June 12th, 2021 4:54 pm ET

generic cialis 200 mg buy tadalafil online cialis voucher

cemeSwa   June 12th, 2021 10:39 pm ET

cialis on line cialis purchase online buy cialis online overnight shipping

EdumpAni   June 13th, 2021 5:02 am ET

Zyvox can you buy prescription drugs in canada save on pharmacy

ThillAsd   June 13th, 2021 9:55 am ET

how can i get cialis fast cialis canadian purchase puchsae cialis

ThillAsd   June 13th, 2021 2:07 pm ET

best place to buy generic cialis cialis 20 mg tablets and prices cialis 10mg generic

EdumpGtv   June 13th, 2021 5:00 pm ET

is it illegal to buy drugs from canada 1 canadian pharmacy canadian pharmacies requiring prescriptions

pharmaceptica   June 21st, 2021 1:04 pm ET


Leave Your Comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Are you a gadgethead? Do you spend hours a day online? Or are you just curious about how technology impacts your life? In this digital age, it's increasingly important to be fluent, or at least familiar, with the big tech trends. From gadgets to Google, smartphones to social media, this blog will help keep you informed.

subscribe RSS Icon
Powered by VIP